What are the chances of seeing an Idaea mediaria in Sierra de Guadarrama National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report an Idaea mediaria sighting in Sierra de Guadarrama National Park on a given day, based on 7 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 416th most-seen of the 597 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 30%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see an Idaea mediaria in Sierra de Guadarrama National Park?
July
In that month about 10% of wildlife watchers report an Idaea mediaria in Sierra de Guadarrama National Park on a given day, against under 5% in August to June, the lowest months. That is one of Sierra de Guadarrama National Park's driest months, with about 20 mm of rain against 110 mm in November.
What time of day is best to see an Idaea mediaria?
Between 10 pm and 1 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Idaea mediaria sightings with a recorded time, and about 6 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is seen both by day and at night.
Is Sierra de Guadarrama National Park the best place to see an Idaea mediaria?
2nd of 2
Of the 2 parks where we can rate Idaea mediaria sightings, Sierra de Guadarrama National Park ranks 2nd at under 5%. The best odds are in Sierra Nevada National Park (Spain, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Idaea mediaria live in Sierra de Guadarrama National Park?
Same genus: Idaea
The closest relatives of the Idaea mediaria that you can see in Sierra de Guadarrama National Park (genus Idaea) are Portland Ribbon Wave (about 10%), Idaea ostrinaria (about 10%) and Bright Wave (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Idaea mediaria sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Idaea mediaria is recorded against all the insects logged in Sierra de Guadarrama National Park (7 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.