What are the chances of seeing a Rhegmatophila alpina in Sierra de Guadarrama National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Rhegmatophila alpina sighting in Sierra de Guadarrama National Park on a given day, based on 6 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 473rd most-seen of the 597 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 20%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Rhegmatophila alpina in Sierra de Guadarrama National Park?
May and June
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Rhegmatophila alpina in Sierra de Guadarrama National Park on a given day, against under 5% in July to April, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Rhegmatophila alpina?
Between 5 and 8 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Rhegmatophila alpina sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Where else can you see a Rhegmatophila alpina?
Only Sierra de Guadarrama National Park, in our data
Sierra de Guadarrama National Park is the only park on Wallace's Line with enough records to rate Rhegmatophila alpina sightings: under 5% of wildlife watchers there report one on a given day.
Which relatives of the Rhegmatophila alpina live in Sierra de Guadarrama National Park?
Same family: Notodontidae
The closest relatives of the Rhegmatophila alpina that you can see in Sierra de Guadarrama National Park (family Notodontidae, Prominent Moths) are Pine Processionary-Moth (about 20%), Tawny Prominent (about 10%) and Pale Prominent (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Rhegmatophila alpina sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Rhegmatophila alpina is recorded against all the insects logged in Sierra de Guadarrama National Park (6 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.