What are the chances of seeing a Pale Prominent in Sierra de Guadarrama National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Pale Prominent sighting in Sierra de Guadarrama National Park on a given day, based on 12 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 281st most-seen of the 597 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 30%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Pale Prominent in Sierra de Guadarrama National Park?
May to July
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Pale Prominent in Sierra de Guadarrama National Park on a given day, against under 5% in August to April, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Pale Prominent?
Between 10 pm and 1 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Pale Prominent sightings with a recorded time, and about 6 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is seen both by day and at night.
Is Sierra de Guadarrama National Park the best place to see a Pale Prominent?
7th of 7
Of the 7 parks where we can rate Pale Prominent sightings, Sierra de Guadarrama National Park ranks 7th at about 10%. The best odds are in Biebrza National Park (Poland, about 20%), Sierra Nevada National Park (Spain, about 10%) and Bavarian Forest National Park (Germany, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Pale Prominent live in Sierra de Guadarrama National Park?
Same family: Notodontidae
The closest relatives of the Pale Prominent that you can see in Sierra de Guadarrama National Park (family Notodontidae, Prominent Moths) are Pine Processionary-Moth (about 20%), Tawny Prominent (about 10%) and Lunar Marbled Brown (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Pale Prominent sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Pale Prominent is recorded against all the insects logged in Sierra de Guadarrama National Park (12 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.