What are the chances of seeing a Small Chocolate-Tip in Sierra Nevada National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Small Chocolate-Tip sighting in Sierra Nevada National Park on a given day, based on 9 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 330th most-seen of the 479 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 50%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Small Chocolate-Tip in Sierra Nevada National Park?
September
In that month about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Small Chocolate-Tip in Sierra Nevada National Park on a given day, against under 5% in May–June and November–March, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Small Chocolate-Tip?
Between 10 pm and 1 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Small Chocolate-Tip sightings with a recorded time, and about 7 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is mostly seen at night.
Is Sierra Nevada National Park the best place to see a Small Chocolate-Tip?
Yes
Of the 3 parks where we can rate Small Chocolate-Tip sightings, Sierra Nevada National Park has the highest daily chance: about 10%. Next come Wadden Sea National Park (Germany, about 10%) and Bavarian Forest National Park (Germany, under 5%).
Which relatives of the Small Chocolate-Tip live in Sierra Nevada National Park?
Same family: Notodontidae
The closest relatives of the Small Chocolate-Tip that you can see in Sierra Nevada National Park (family Notodontidae, Prominent Moths) are Pine Processionary-Moth (about 30%), Pale Prominent (about 10%) and Tawny Prominent (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Small Chocolate-Tip sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Small Chocolate-Tip is recorded against all the insects logged in Sierra Nevada National Park (9 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.