What are the chances of seeing a Perola repetita in Soberanía National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Perola repetita sighting in Soberanía National Park on a given day, based on 7 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 157th most-seen of the 253 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 30%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Perola repetita in Soberanía National Park?
September
In that month about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Perola repetita in Soberanía National Park on a given day, against under 5% in May–July and November–March, the lowest months. That is one of Soberanía National Park's wettest months, with about 310 mm of rain against 25 mm in February.
What time of day is best to see a Perola repetita?
Between 6 and 9 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Perola repetita sightings with a recorded time, and about 7 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is most active around dawn and dusk.
Is Soberanía National Park the best place to see a Perola repetita?
Among the best
Of the 3 parks where we can rate Perola repetita sightings, Soberanía National Park ranks 3rd at about 10%, level with the leaders once rounded. The best odds are in Cerro Azul Meámbar National Park (Honduras, about 10%) and Lago de Yojoa (Honduras, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Perola repetita live in Soberanía National Park?
Same family: Limacodidae
The closest relatives of the Perola repetita that you can see in Soberanía National Park (family Limacodidae, Slug Caterpillar Moths) are Acharia hyperoche (about 10%) and Sibine nesea (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Perola repetita sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Perola repetita is recorded against all the insects logged in Soberanía National Park (7 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.