What are the chances of seeing an Amblychia subrubida in Springbrook National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report an Amblychia subrubida sighting in Springbrook National Park on a given day, based on 15 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 160th most-seen of the 429 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 50%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see an Amblychia subrubida in Springbrook National Park?
September
In that month about 30% of wildlife watchers report an Amblychia subrubida in Springbrook National Park on a given day, against under 5% in January–July and November, the lowest months. That is one of Springbrook National Park's driest months, with about 55 mm of rain against 210 mm in February.
What time of day is best to see an Amblychia subrubida?
Between 7 and 10 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Amblychia subrubida sightings with a recorded time, and about 6 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is seen both by day and at night.
Where else can you see an Amblychia subrubida?
Only Springbrook National Park, in our data
Springbrook National Park is the only park on Wallace's Line with enough records to rate Amblychia subrubida sightings: about 10% of wildlife watchers there report one on a given day.
Which relatives of the Amblychia subrubida live in Springbrook National Park?
Same family: Geometridae
The closest relatives of the Amblychia subrubida that you can see in Springbrook National Park (family Geometridae, Geometer Moths) are Paradromulia ambigua (about 20%), White Looper Moth (about 20%) and Southern Bracca (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Amblychia subrubida sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Amblychia subrubida is recorded against all the insects logged in Springbrook National Park (15 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.