What are the chances of seeing a Crasilogia gressitti in Springbrook National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Crasilogia gressitti sighting in Springbrook National Park on a given day, based on 21 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 72nd most-seen of the 429 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 60%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Crasilogia gressitti in Springbrook National Park?
May
In that month about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Crasilogia gressitti in Springbrook National Park on a given day, against under 5% in April, June–July and October, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Crasilogia gressitti?
Between 7 and 10 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Crasilogia gressitti sightings with a recorded time, and about half of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is most active around dawn and dusk.
Is Springbrook National Park the best place to see a Crasilogia gressitti?
Yes
Of the 3 parks where we can rate Crasilogia gressitti sightings, Springbrook National Park has the highest daily chance: about 10%. Next come Lamington National Park (Australia, about 10%) and Blue Mountains National Park (Australia, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Crasilogia gressitti live in Springbrook National Park?
Same family: Geometridae
The closest relatives of the Crasilogia gressitti that you can see in Springbrook National Park (family Geometridae, Geometer Moths) are Paradromulia ambigua (about 20%), White Looper Moth (about 20%) and Southern Bracca (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Crasilogia gressitti sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Crasilogia gressitti is recorded against all the insects logged in Springbrook National Park (21 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.