What are the chances of seeing an Atteva niphocosma in Springbrook National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report an Atteva niphocosma sighting in Springbrook National Park on a given day, based on 5 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 358th most-seen of the 429 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 30%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see an Atteva niphocosma in Springbrook National Park?
July and August
In those months about 20% of wildlife watchers report an Atteva niphocosma in Springbrook National Park on a given day, against under 5% in September to June, the lowest months. Those are among Springbrook National Park's driest months, with about 50 mm of rain a month against 210 mm in February.
What time of day is best to see an Atteva niphocosma?
Between 7 and 10 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Atteva niphocosma sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is mostly seen at night.
Is Springbrook National Park the best place to see an Atteva niphocosma?
Among the best
Of the 2 parks where we can rate Atteva niphocosma sightings, Springbrook National Park ranks 2nd at about 10%, level with the leaders once rounded. The best odds are in Daintree National Park (Australia, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Atteva niphocosma live in Springbrook National Park?
Same order: Lepidoptera
The closest relatives of the Atteva niphocosma that you can see in Springbrook National Park (order Lepidoptera, Butterflies and Moths) are Paradromulia ambigua (about 20%), Orchard Swallowtail (about 20%) and Brown Ringlet (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Atteva niphocosma sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Atteva niphocosma is recorded against all the insects logged in Springbrook National Park (5 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.