What are the chances of seeing a Bastilla solomonensis in Springbrook National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Bastilla solomonensis sighting in Springbrook National Park on a given day, based on 23 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 72nd most-seen of the 429 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 60%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Bastilla solomonensis in Springbrook National Park?
April and May
In those months about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Bastilla solomonensis in Springbrook National Park on a given day, against under 5% in July to December, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Bastilla solomonensis?
Between 7 and 10 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Bastilla solomonensis sightings with a recorded time, and about 7 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is mostly seen at night.
Is Springbrook National Park the best place to see a Bastilla solomonensis?
Yes
Of the 3 parks where we can rate Bastilla solomonensis sightings, Springbrook National Park has the highest daily chance: about 10%. Next come Lamington National Park (Australia, about 10%) and Daintree National Park (Australia, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Bastilla solomonensis live in Springbrook National Park?
Same family: Erebidae
The closest relatives of the Bastilla solomonensis that you can see in Springbrook National Park (family Erebidae, Underwing, Tiger, Tussock, and Allied Moths) are Eilema plana (about 20%), Asian Magpie Moth (about 20%) and Jute Looper (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Bastilla solomonensis sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Bastilla solomonensis is recorded against all the insects logged in Springbrook National Park (23 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.