What are the chances of seeing a Conchylis fuscicepsana in Springbrook National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Conchylis fuscicepsana sighting in Springbrook National Park on a given day, based on 5 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 358th most-seen of the 429 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 30%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Conchylis fuscicepsana in Springbrook National Park?
January–April and September
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Conchylis fuscicepsana in Springbrook National Park on a given day, against under 5% in May–August and October–December, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Conchylis fuscicepsana?
Between 7 and 10 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Conchylis fuscicepsana sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is mostly seen at night.
Where else can you see a Conchylis fuscicepsana?
Only Springbrook National Park, in our data
Springbrook National Park is the only park on Wallace's Line with enough records to rate Conchylis fuscicepsana sightings: about 10% of wildlife watchers there report one on a given day.
Which relatives of the Conchylis fuscicepsana live in Springbrook National Park?
Same family: Tortricidae
The closest relatives of the Conchylis fuscicepsana that you can see in Springbrook National Park (family Tortricidae, Tortricid Leafroller Moths) are Acroceuthes metaxanthana (about 10%), Thrincophora lignigerana (about 10%) and Goboea copiosana (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Conchylis fuscicepsana sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Conchylis fuscicepsana is recorded against all the insects logged in Springbrook National Park (5 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.