What are the chances of seeing a Hypena pelodes in Springbrook National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Hypena pelodes sighting in Springbrook National Park on a given day, based on 6 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 312th most-seen of the 429 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Hypena pelodes in Springbrook National Park?
August
In that month about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Hypena pelodes in Springbrook National Park on a given day, against under 5% in March, May–July, October and December–January, the lowest months. That is one of Springbrook National Park's driest months, with about 45 mm of rain against 210 mm in February.
What time of day is best to see a Hypena pelodes?
Between 7 and 10 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Hypena pelodes sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is mostly seen at night.
Is Springbrook National Park the best place to see a Hypena pelodes?
Among the best
Of the 2 parks where we can rate Hypena pelodes sightings, Springbrook National Park ranks 2nd at about 10%, level with the leaders once rounded. The best odds are in Lamington National Park (Australia, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Hypena pelodes live in Springbrook National Park?
Same genus: Hypena
The closest relatives of the Hypena pelodes that you can see in Springbrook National Park (genus Hypena) are Brown Triangle Snout (about 10%), Hypena isogona (about 10%) and Hypena gonospilalis (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Hypena pelodes sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Hypena pelodes is recorded against all the insects logged in Springbrook National Park (6 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.