Scaphidriotis xylogramma
In 3 days ~20% in a week ~40%
Scaphidriotis xylogramma is a moth of the subfamily Arctiinae. It was described by Alfred Jefferis Turner in 1899. It is found in the Australian state of Queensland. Wikipedia →
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Springbrook National Park | 🇦🇺 Australia |
More parks will be added in future updates.
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Scaphidriotis xylogramma sighting in Springbrook National Park on a given day, based on 6 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 312th most-seen of the 429 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
April–May, August and December
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Scaphidriotis xylogramma in Springbrook National Park on a given day, against under 5% in January–March, June–July and September–November, the lowest months.
Between 6 and 9 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Scaphidriotis xylogramma sightings with a recorded time, and about 7 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is most active around dawn and dusk.
Only Springbrook National Park, in our data
Springbrook National Park is the only park on Wallace's Line with enough records to rate Scaphidriotis xylogramma sightings: about 10% of wildlife watchers there report one on a given day.
Same family: Erebidae
The closest relatives of the Scaphidriotis xylogramma that you can see in Springbrook National Park (family Erebidae, Underwing, Tiger, Tussock, and Allied Moths) are Eilema plana (about 20%), Asian Magpie Moth (about 20%) and Jute Looper (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Scaphidriotis xylogramma is recorded against all the insects logged in Springbrook National Park (6 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
