What are the chances of seeing a Cape Batis in Table Mountain National Park?
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Cape Batis sighting in Table Mountain National Park on a given day, based on 1,361 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 39th most-seen of the 223 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 40%, and over a week to about 70%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Cape Batis in Table Mountain National Park?
November
In that month about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Cape Batis in Table Mountain National Park on a given day, against about 10% in January–February and June–July, the lowest months. That is one of Table Mountain National Park's driest months, with about 25 mm of rain against 110 mm in June.
What time of day is best to see a Cape Batis?
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Cape Batis sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Table Mountain National Park the best place to see a Cape Batis?
2nd of 7
Of the 7 parks where we can rate Cape Batis sightings, Table Mountain National Park ranks 2nd at about 20%. The best odds are in Garden Route National Park (South Africa, about 40%).
Which relatives of the Cape Batis live in Table Mountain National Park?
Same order: Passeriformes
The closest relatives of the Cape Batis that you can see in Table Mountain National Park (order Passeriformes, Perching Birds) are Red-winged Starling (about 80%), Cape White-eye (about 70%) and Southern Double-collared Sunbird (about 70%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Cape Batis sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Cape Batis is recorded against all the birds logged in Table Mountain National Park (1,361 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.