Cyclidia substigmaria
In 3 days ~20% in a week ~50%
Cyclidia substigmaria is a species of moth in the family Drepanidae described by Jacob Hübner in 1831. It is found in Taiwan, China, India and Japan. The wingspan is 55–65 mm. The larvae are gregarious and specialist herbivores on Alangium species. Wikipedia →
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Taroko National Park | 🇹🇼 Taiwan |
More parks will be added in future updates.
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Cyclidia substigmaria sighting in Taroko National Park on a given day, based on 7 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 272nd most-seen of the 447 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 50%, if each day is a fresh chance.
March
In that month about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Cyclidia substigmaria in Taroko National Park on a given day, against under 5% in February, May–September and December, the lowest months.
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Cyclidia substigmaria sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Only Taroko National Park, in our data
Taroko National Park is the only park on Wallace's Line with enough records to rate Cyclidia substigmaria sightings: about 10% of wildlife watchers there report one on a given day.
Same family: Drepanidae
The closest relatives of the Cyclidia substigmaria that you can see in Taroko National Park (family Drepanidae, Hooktip and False Owlet Moths) are Habrosyne indica (about 10%), Horithyatira decorata (about 10%) and Horithyatira takamukui (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Cyclidia substigmaria is recorded against all the insects logged in Taroko National Park (7 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
