Daddala lucilla
In 3 days ~20% in a week ~40%
Daddala lucilla is a species of moth in the family Erebidae. The species is found in the Himalaya, Taiwan, Japan, Burma, Thailand, Sumatra, Borneo, Java, Bali and Sulawesi. The wingspan is 48–54 mm. Wikipedia →
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Taroko National Park | 🇹🇼 Taiwan |
More parks will be added in future updates.
| # | City | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tokyo | 🇯🇵 Japan |
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Daddala lucilla sighting in Taroko National Park on a given day, based on 6 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 315th most-seen of the 447 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
January
In that month about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Daddala lucilla in Taroko National Park on a given day, against under 5% in March–May and July–December, the lowest months.
Between 7 and 10 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Daddala lucilla sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is mostly seen at night.
Only Taroko National Park, in our data
Taroko National Park is the only park on Wallace's Line with enough records to rate Daddala lucilla sightings: about 10% of wildlife watchers there report one on a given day.
Same family: Erebidae
The closest relatives of the Daddala lucilla that you can see in Taroko National Park (family Erebidae, Underwing, Tiger, Tussock, and Allied Moths) are Cocoa Tussock Moth (about 60%), Taiwan Yellow Tussock Moth (about 50%) and Chrysaeglia magnifica (about 40%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Daddala lucilla is recorded against all the insects logged in Taroko National Park (6 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
