What are the chances of seeing a Taicallimorpha albipuncta in Taroko National Park?
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Taicallimorpha albipuncta sighting in Taroko National Park on a given day, based on 25 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 83rd most-seen of the 447 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 40%, and over a week to about 70%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Taicallimorpha albipuncta in Taroko National Park?
July
In that month about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Taicallimorpha albipuncta in Taroko National Park on a given day, against under 5% in September to March, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Taicallimorpha albipuncta?
Between 7 and 10 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Taicallimorpha albipuncta sightings with a recorded time, and about 6 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is seen both by day and at night.
Where else can you see a Taicallimorpha albipuncta?
Only Taroko National Park, in our data
Taroko National Park is the only park on Wallace's Line with enough records to rate Taicallimorpha albipuncta sightings: about 20% of wildlife watchers there report one on a given day.
Which relatives of the Taicallimorpha albipuncta live in Taroko National Park?
Same family: Erebidae
The closest relatives of the Taicallimorpha albipuncta that you can see in Taroko National Park (family Erebidae, Underwing, Tiger, Tussock, and Allied Moths) are Cocoa Tussock Moth (about 60%), Taiwan Yellow Tussock Moth (about 50%) and Chrysaeglia magnifica (about 40%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Taicallimorpha albipuncta sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Taicallimorpha albipuncta is recorded against all the insects logged in Taroko National Park (25 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.