Chlorida costata
In 3 days ~10% in a week ~30%
Chlorida costata is a species of beetle in the family Cerambycidae. It was described by Audinet-Serville in 1834. It is known from southeastern Brazil, Paraguay, Argentina, and Uruguay. Wikipedia →
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tijuca National Park | 🇧🇷 Brazil |
More parks will be added in future updates.
| # | City | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | São Paulo | 🇧🇷 Brazil |
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Chlorida costata sighting in Tijuca National Park on a given day, based on 6 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 95th most-seen of the 132 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 30%, if each day is a fresh chance.
February–March, July and November
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Chlorida costata in Tijuca National Park on a given day, against under 5% in April–June, August–October and December–January, the lowest months.
Between noon and 3 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Chlorida costata sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Only Tijuca National Park, in our data
Tijuca National Park is the only park on Wallace's Line with enough records to rate Chlorida costata sightings: under 5% of wildlife watchers there report one on a given day.
Same family: Cerambycidae
The closest relatives of the Chlorida costata that you can see in Tijuca National Park (family Cerambycidae, Longhorn Beetles) are Pyrodes nitidus (about 20%) and Taeniotes amazonum (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Chlorida costata is recorded against all the insects logged in Tijuca National Park (6 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
