What are the chances of seeing a Macropophora accentifer in Tijuca National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Macropophora accentifer sighting in Tijuca National Park on a given day, based on 6 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 95th most-seen of the 132 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 30%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Macropophora accentifer in Tijuca National Park?
January, April, June and September–October
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Macropophora accentifer in Tijuca National Park on a given day, against under 5% in February–March, May, July–August and November–December, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Macropophora accentifer?
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Macropophora accentifer sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Tijuca National Park the best place to see a Macropophora accentifer?
3rd of 3
Of the 3 parks where we can rate Macropophora accentifer sightings, Tijuca National Park ranks 3rd at under 5%. The best odds are in Iguazú National Park (Argentina, about 10%) and Iguaçu National Park (Brazil, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Macropophora accentifer live in Tijuca National Park?
Same family: Cerambycidae
The closest relatives of the Macropophora accentifer that you can see in Tijuca National Park (family Cerambycidae, Longhorn Beetles) are Pyrodes nitidus (about 20%) and Taeniotes amazonum (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Macropophora accentifer sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Macropophora accentifer is recorded against all the insects logged in Tijuca National Park (6 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.