What are the chances of seeing a Magellanic Woodpecker in Torres del Paine National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Magellanic Woodpecker sighting in Torres del Paine National Park on a given day, based on 305 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 50th most-seen of the 106 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 60%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Magellanic Woodpecker in Torres del Paine National Park?
January
In that month about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Magellanic Woodpecker in Torres del Paine National Park on a given day, against about 10% in February to December, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Magellanic Woodpecker?
Between noon and 3 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Magellanic Woodpecker sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Torres del Paine National Park the best place to see a Magellanic Woodpecker?
3rd of 4
Of the 4 parks where we can rate Magellanic Woodpecker sightings, Torres del Paine National Park ranks 3rd at about 10%. The best odds are in Tierra del Fuego National Park (Argentina, about 50%) and Vicente Pérez Rosales National Park (Chile, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Magellanic Woodpecker live in Torres del Paine National Park?
Same family: Picidae
The closest relatives of the Magellanic Woodpecker that you can see in Torres del Paine National Park (family Picidae, Woodpeckers) are Chilean Flicker (about 20%) and Striped Woodpecker (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Magellanic Woodpecker sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Magellanic Woodpecker is recorded against all the birds logged in Torres del Paine National Park (305 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.