What are the chances of seeing a Thicket Antpitta in Utría National Natural Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Thicket Antpitta sighting in Utría National Natural Park on a given day, based on 6 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 142nd most-seen of the 154 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 30%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Thicket Antpitta in Utría National Natural Park?
March, May and August–October
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Thicket Antpitta in Utría National Natural Park on a given day, against under 5% in January–February, July and November, the lowest months. April, June and December have too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see a Thicket Antpitta?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Thicket Antpitta sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Utría National Natural Park the best place to see a Thicket Antpitta?
2nd of 9
Of the 9 parks where we can rate Thicket Antpitta sightings, Utría National Natural Park ranks 2nd at about 10%. The best odds are in Arenal Volcano National Park (Costa Rica, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Thicket Antpitta live in Utría National Natural Park?
Same order: Passeriformes
The closest relatives of the Thicket Antpitta that you can see in Utría National Natural Park (order Passeriformes, Perching Birds) are Great-tailed Grackle (about 60%), Chestnut-backed Antbird (about 50%) and Flame-rumped Tanager (about 50%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Thicket Antpitta sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Thicket Antpitta is recorded against all the birds logged in Utría National Natural Park (6 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.