Conognatha viridiventris
In 3 days ~50% in a week ~80%
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Vicente Pérez Rosales National Park | 🇨🇱 Chile |
More parks will be added in future updates.
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Conognatha viridiventris sighting in Vicente Pérez Rosales National Park on a given day, based on 6 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 7th most-seen of the 8 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 50%, and over a week to about 80%, if each day is a fresh chance.
February and November–December
In those months about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Conognatha viridiventris in Vicente Pérez Rosales National Park on a given day, against under 5% in March, May, July and October, the lowest months. Those are among Vicente Pérez Rosales National Park's driest months, with about 150 mm of rain a month against 490 mm in June.
Between 11 am and 2 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Conognatha viridiventris sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Only Vicente Pérez Rosales National Park, in our data
Vicente Pérez Rosales National Park is the only park on Wallace's Line with enough records to rate Conognatha viridiventris sightings: about 20% of wildlife watchers there report one on a given day.
Same order: Coleoptera
The closest relatives of the Conognatha viridiventris that you can see in Vicente Pérez Rosales National Park (order Coleoptera, Beetles) are Chilean Stag Beetle (about 40%), Apterodorcus bacchus (about 40%) and Rhyephenes maillei (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Conognatha viridiventris is recorded against all the insects logged in Vicente Pérez Rosales National Park (6 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
