Rhyephenes maillei
In 3 days ~50% in a week ~80%
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Torres del Paine National Park | 🇨🇱 Chile | |
| 2 | Vicente Pérez Rosales National Park | 🇨🇱 Chile | |
| 3 | Nahuel Huapi National Park | 🇦🇷 Argentina |
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Rhyephenes maillei sighting in Vicente Pérez Rosales National Park on a given day, based on 5 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 7th most-seen of the 8 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 50%, and over a week to about 80%, if each day is a fresh chance.
November to January
In those months about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Rhyephenes maillei in Vicente Pérez Rosales National Park on a given day, against under 5% in March, May, July and October, the lowest months. Those are among Vicente Pérez Rosales National Park's driest months, with about 150 mm of rain a month against 490 mm in June.
Between 11 am and 2 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Rhyephenes maillei sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Among the best
Of the 3 parks where we can rate Rhyephenes maillei sightings, Vicente Pérez Rosales National Park ranks 2nd at about 20%, level with the leaders once rounded. The best odds are in Torres del Paine National Park (Chile, about 20%).
Same order: Coleoptera
The closest relatives of the Rhyephenes maillei that you can see in Vicente Pérez Rosales National Park (order Coleoptera, Beetles) are Chilean Stag Beetle (about 40%), Apterodorcus bacchus (about 40%) and Conognatha viridiventris (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Rhyephenes maillei is recorded against all the insects logged in Vicente Pérez Rosales National Park (5 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
