Perdix perdix
Silhouette: PhyloPic
In 3 days <5% in a week ~10%
The grey partridge (Perdix perdix) is a bird in the pheasant family Phasianidae of the order Galliformes, gallinaceous birds. The scientific name is the Latin for "partridge". The grey partridge was formally described in 1758 by the Swedish naturalist Carl Linnaeus in the tenth edition of his Systema Naturae under the binomial name Tetrao perdix. Linnaeus specified the type locality as Europe but this has been restricted to Sweden. The word perdix is Latin meaning "partridge", from Ancient Greek περδιξ/perdix meaning "partridge". The grey partridge together with the Daurian partridge and the Tibetan partridge are now placed in the genus Perdix that was introduced in 1760 by the French zoologist Mathurin Jacques Brisson.
Eight subspecies are recognised by the IOC World Bird List, though the differences are clinal, and not all are accepted by other authorities; the HBW/BirdLife International list only accepts six subspecies; the differences noted below:
Nominate, found in the British Isles and southern Scandinavia to Italy and the Balkans. Southwestern France. Wikipedia →
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Biebrza National Park | 🇵🇱 Poland | |
| 2 | Kiskunság National Park | 🇭🇺 Hungary | |
| 3 | Fertő-Hanság National Park | 🇭🇺 Hungary | |
| 4 | Pyrénées National Park | 🇫🇷 France | |
| 5 | Aigüestortes National Park | 🇪🇸 Spain | |
| 6 | Ordesa y Monte Perdido National Park | 🇪🇸 Spain | |
| 7 | Picos de Europa National Park | 🇪🇸 Spain | |
| 8 | Cairngorms National Park | 🇬🇧 United Kingdom | |
| 9 | Wadden Sea National Park | 🇩🇪 Germany |
| # | City | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sincan | 🇹🇷 Turkey | |
| 2 | Novosibirsk | 🇷🇺 Russia | |
| 3 | Edmonton | 🇨🇦 Canada | |
| 4 | Minsk | 🇧🇾 Belarus | |
| 5 | Kyiv | 🇺🇦 Ukraine | |
| 6 | Calgary | 🇨🇦 Canada | |
| 7 | Manchester | 🇬🇧 United Kingdom | |
| 8 | Liverpool | 🇬🇧 United Kingdom | |
| 9 | Leeds | 🇬🇧 United Kingdom | |
| 10 | Rotterdam [The Hague] | 🇳🇱 Netherlands |
| # | Zoo / Centre | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Prague Zoo | 🇨🇿 Czechia | |
| 2 | Natura Artis Magistra | 🇳🇱 Netherlands | |
| 3 | Watatunga Wildlife Reserve | 🇬🇧 United Kingdom | |
| 4 | Hellabrunn Zoo | 🇩🇪 Germany | |
| 5 | Yerevan Zoo | 🇦🇲 Armenia | |
| 6 | Kyiv Zoo | 🇺🇦 Ukraine | |
| 7 | Molló Parc Aventura | 🇪🇸 Spain | |
| 8 | Zoopark Limpopo | 🇷🇺 Russia | |
| 9 | Santillana Zoo | 🇪🇸 Spain | |
| 10 | Zoo Koki (Parque zoológico y botánico) | 🇪🇸 Spain | |
| 11 | Rákosův pavilon | 🇨🇿 Czechia | |
| 12 | Velemlokárium | 🇨🇿 Czechia | |
| 13 | Ogród Zoologiczny w Katowicach | 🇵🇱 Poland | |
| 14 | Tierpark Schlichtweg 15 in München | 🇩🇪 Germany | |
| 15 | Zoo Schlichtweg 11 in München | 🇩🇪 Germany | |
| 16 | Zoo Siebenbrunner Straße 6 in München | 🇩🇪 Germany |
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Gray Partridge sighting in Aigüestortes National Park on a given day, based on 10 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 101st most-seen of the 114 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, and over a week to about 10%, if each day is a fresh chance.
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Gray Partridge in Aigüestortes National Park on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season.
Between 4 and 7 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Gray Partridge sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
5th of 9
Of the 9 parks where we can rate Gray Partridge sightings, Aigüestortes National Park ranks 5th at under 5%. The best odds are in Biebrza National Park (Poland, about 10%), Kiskunság National Park (Hungary, about 10%) and Fertő-Hanság National Park (Hungary, under 5%).
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Gray Partridge is recorded against all the birds logged in Aigüestortes National Park (10 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
