What are the chances of seeing a Yellow-throated Woodpecker in Anavilhanas National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Yellow-throated Woodpecker sighting in Anavilhanas National Park on a given day, based on 20 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 163rd most-seen of the 291 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 30%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Yellow-throated Woodpecker in Anavilhanas National Park?
May
In that month about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Yellow-throated Woodpecker in Anavilhanas National Park on a given day, against under 5% in April, June–July and September–February, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Yellow-throated Woodpecker?
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Yellow-throated Woodpecker sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Anavilhanas National Park the best place to see a Yellow-throated Woodpecker?
3rd of 7
Of the 7 parks where we can rate Yellow-throated Woodpecker sightings, Anavilhanas National Park ranks 3rd at about 10%. The best odds are in Serra dos Órgãos National Park (Brazil, about 40%) and Brownsberg Nature Park (Suriname, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Yellow-throated Woodpecker live in Anavilhanas National Park?
Same family: Picidae
The closest relatives of the Yellow-throated Woodpecker that you can see in Anavilhanas National Park (family Picidae, Woodpeckers) are Lineated Woodpecker (about 10%), Yellow-tufted Woodpecker (about 10%) and Ringed Woodpecker (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Yellow-throated Woodpecker sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Yellow-throated Woodpecker is recorded against all the birds logged in Anavilhanas National Park (20 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.