Haemodiasma tessellata
In 3 days ~20% in a week ~30%
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rincón de la Vieja National Park | 🇨🇷 Costa Rica | |
| 2 | Chirripó National Park | 🇨🇷 Costa Rica | |
| 3 | Monteverde Cloud Forest Reserve | 🇨🇷 Costa Rica | |
| 4 | Arenal Volcano National Park | 🇨🇷 Costa Rica | |
| 5 | La Amistad International Park (Panama) | 🇵🇦 Panama |
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Haemodiasma tessellata sighting in Arenal Volcano National Park on a given day, based on 7 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 198th most-seen of the 302 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 30%, if each day is a fresh chance.
May–June, August and October–December
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Haemodiasma tessellata in Arenal Volcano National Park on a given day, against under 5% in January–April, July and September, the lowest months.
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Haemodiasma tessellata sightings with a recorded time, and about 7 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
4th of 5
Of the 5 parks where we can rate Haemodiasma tessellata sightings, Arenal Volcano National Park ranks 4th at about 10%. The best odds are in Rincón de la Vieja National Park (Costa Rica, about 20%), Chirripó National Park (Costa Rica, about 10%) and Monteverde Cloud Forest Reserve (Costa Rica, about 10%).
Same family: Tettigoniidae
The closest relatives of the Haemodiasma tessellata that you can see in Arenal Volcano National Park (family Tettigoniidae, Katydids) are Rhinoceros Katydid (about 20%), Ischnomela pulchripennis (about 20%) and Melanonotus powellorum (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Haemodiasma tessellata is recorded against all the insects logged in Arenal Volcano National Park (7 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
