Pseudoalcippe abyssinica
Silhouette: PhyloPic
In 3 days ~10% in a week ~30%
The African hill babbler (Sylvia abyssinica) is a species of bird in the family Sylviidae. The African hill babbler was described by the German naturalist Eduard Rüppell in 1840 under the binomial name Drymophila abyssinica. The type locality is the Simen Mountains, northern Ethiopia.
There are currently six recognised subspecies: The distinctive black-headed Rwenzori hill babbler (Sylvia atriceps) has been considered as a subspecies. Fry et al. (2000) state it has the same vocalizations and behaviour as other races, and do not give it the... Wikipedia →
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Aberdare National Park | 🇰🇪 Kenya | |
| 2 | Bale Mountains National Park | 🇪🇹 Ethiopia | |
| 3 | Arusha National Park | 🇹🇿 Tanzania | |
| 4 | Mkomazi National Park | 🇹🇿 Tanzania | |
| 5 | Ngorongoro Conservation Area | 🇹🇿 Tanzania |
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Pseudoalcippe abyssinica sighting in Arusha National Park on a given day, based on 30 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 208th most-seen of the 373 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 30%, if each day is a fresh chance.
April–May, July and October–November
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Pseudoalcippe abyssinica in Arusha National Park on a given day, against under 5% in June, August–September and December–March, the lowest months.
3rd of 5
Of the 5 parks where we can rate Pseudoalcippe abyssinica sightings, Arusha National Park ranks 3rd at about 10%. The best odds are in Aberdare National Park (Kenya, about 20%) and Bale Mountains National Park (Ethiopia, about 10%).
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Pseudoalcippe abyssinica is recorded against all the birds logged in Arusha National Park (30 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
