_Figure_3_(cropped).jpg/500px-Kalophrynus_meizon_(10.3897-evolsyst.2.27020)_Figure_3_(cropped).jpg)
Kalophrynus meizon
Silhouette: Dmitry Bogdanov (vectorized by T. Michael Keesey) · PhyloPic
In 3 days ~50% in a week ~80%
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bako National Park | 🇲🇾 Malaysia | |
| 2 | Kinabalu Park | 🇲🇾 Malaysia | |
| 3 | Sepilok | 🇲🇾 Malaysia |
| # | City | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kuching | 🇲🇾 Malaysia |
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Bornean Sticky Frog sighting in Bako National Park on a given day, based on 7 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 8th most-seen of the 11 amphibians we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 50%, and over a week to about 80%, if each day is a fresh chance.
June
In that month about 50% of wildlife watchers report a Bornean Sticky Frog in Bako National Park on a given day, against under 5% in January–May, August and October–November, the lowest months.
Between 1 and 4 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Bornean Sticky Frog sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Yes
Of the 3 parks where we can rate Bornean Sticky Frog sightings, Bako National Park has the highest daily chance: about 20%. Next come Kinabalu Park (Malaysia, about 20%) and Sepilok (Malaysia, about 10%).
Same order: Anura
The closest relatives of the Bornean Sticky Frog that you can see in Bako National Park (order Anura, Frogs and Toads) are Brown Marsh Frog (about 50%), Copper-cheeked Frog (about 50%) and Lowland Dwarf Toad (about 40%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Bornean Sticky Frog is recorded against all the amphibians logged in Bako National Park (7 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
