What are the chances of seeing a Malabar Whistling-Thrush in Bandhavgarh National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Malabar Whistling-Thrush sighting in Bandhavgarh National Park on a given day, based on 8 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 236th most-seen of the 241 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Malabar Whistling-Thrush in Bandhavgarh National Park?
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Malabar Whistling-Thrush in Bandhavgarh National Park on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season.
What time of day is best to see a Malabar Whistling-Thrush?
Between 3 and 6 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Malabar Whistling-Thrush sightings with a recorded time, and about 6 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is most active around dawn and dusk.
Is Bandhavgarh National Park the best place to see a Malabar Whistling-Thrush?
8th of 8
Of the 8 parks where we can rate Malabar Whistling-Thrush sightings, Bandhavgarh National Park ranks 8th at under 5%. The best odds are in Periyar National Park (India, about 60%), Eravikulam National Park (India, about 50%) and Mudumalai National Park (India, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Malabar Whistling-Thrush live in Bandhavgarh National Park?
Same family: Muscicapidae
The closest relatives of the Malabar Whistling-Thrush that you can see in Bandhavgarh National Park (family Muscicapidae, Old World Flycatchers, Robins, and Chats) are Oriental Magpie-Robin (about 70%), Indian Robin (about 50%) and Tickell's Blue Flycatcher (about 50%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Malabar Whistling-Thrush sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Malabar Whistling-Thrush is recorded against all the birds logged in Bandhavgarh National Park (8 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.