Ficedula albicilla
Silhouette: Rachael Joakim · PhyloPic
In 3 days ~40% in a week ~70%
The taiga flycatcher or red-throated flycatcher (Ficedula albicilla) is a migratory bird in the family Muscicapidae. The species was first described by Peter Simon Pallas in 1811. The female has brown upper parts with a blackish tail flanked by white. The breast is buffish with underparts mostly white. The male has ear coverts and sides of the neck blue-tinged grey with breeding males having orange-red coloration on the throats. Unlike the taiga flycatcher, the female of the similar red-breasted flycatcher has a brown tail while the red colour in breeding males extends to the breast in the red-breasted flycatcher. It breeds in northern Eurasia from eastern Russia to Siberia and Mongolia. It is a winter visitor to South and South-east Asia in Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Cambodia, Laos, Myanmar, Nepal, Malaysia, Thailand, China, Vietnam, and Japan. Its natural habitat is taiga forest. It is a rare vagrant to western Europe.
It was formerly considered a subspecies of the red-breasted flycatcher. The genus name is from Latin and refers to a small fig-eating bird (ficus, fig) supposed to change into the blackcap in winter. The specific name albicilla is from Latin albus, white, and Neo-Latin cilla tail; this meaning of cilla arose from a misunderstanding of motacilla, the name for the wagtail. Wikipedia →
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kaeng Krachan National Park | 🇹🇭 Thailand | |
| 2 | Khao Yai National Park | 🇹🇭 Thailand | |
| 3 | Doi Inthanon National Park | 🇹🇭 Thailand | |
| 4 | Chitwan National Park | 🇳🇵 Nepal | |
| 5 | Kaziranga National Park | 🇮🇳 India | |
| 6 | Manas National Park | 🇮🇳 India | |
| 7 | Bandhavgarh National Park | 🇮🇳 India | |
| 8 | Royal Bardia National Park | 🇳🇵 Nepal | |
| 9 | Gobi Gurvansaikhan National Park | 🇲🇳 Mongolia | |
| 10 | Keoladeo National Park | 🇮🇳 India | |
| 11 | Kanha National Park | 🇮🇳 India | |
| 12 | Sundarbans National Park | 🇮🇳 India | |
| 13 | Satpura National Park | 🇮🇳 India | |
| 14 | Cuc Phuong National Park | 🇻🇳 Vietnam | |
| 15 | Jim Corbett National Park | 🇮🇳 India | |
| 16 | Cat Tien National Park | 🇻🇳 Vietnam | |
| 17 | Royal Manas National Park | 🇧🇹 Bhutan | |
| 18 | Khao Luang National Park | 🇹🇭 Thailand | |
| 19 | Ranthambore National Park | 🇮🇳 India | |
| 20 | Gir National Park | 🇮🇳 India | |
| 21 | Namdapha National Park | 🇮🇳 India | |
| 22 | Mudumalai National Park | 🇮🇳 India | |
| 23 | Nagarhole National Park | 🇮🇳 India | |
| 24 | Khao Sok National Park | 🇹🇭 Thailand | |
| 25 | Bandipur National Park | 🇮🇳 India |
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Taiga Flycatcher sighting in Bandhavgarh National Park on a given day, based on 369 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 87th most-seen of the 241 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 40%, and over a week to about 70%, if each day is a fresh chance.
January
In that month about 40% of wildlife watchers report a Taiga Flycatcher in Bandhavgarh National Park on a given day, against under 5% in May and June, the lowest months. That is one of Bandhavgarh National Park's driest months, with about 15 mm of rain against 400 mm in August.
Between 4 and 7 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Taiga Flycatcher sightings with a recorded time, and about half of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is most active around dawn and dusk.
7th of 25
Of the 25 parks where we can rate Taiga Flycatcher sightings, Bandhavgarh National Park ranks 7th at about 10%. The best odds are in Kaeng Krachan National Park (Thailand, about 40%), Khao Yai National Park (Thailand, about 40%) and Doi Inthanon National Park (Thailand, about 30%). All parks ranked.
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Taiga Flycatcher is recorded against all the birds logged in Bandhavgarh National Park (369 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
