What are the chances of seeing a Twin-Spotted Quaker in Bavarian Forest National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Twin-Spotted Quaker sighting in Bavarian Forest National Park on a given day, based on 11 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 471st most-seen of the 1115 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Twin-Spotted Quaker in Bavarian Forest National Park?
March
In that month about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Twin-Spotted Quaker in Bavarian Forest National Park on a given day, against under 5% in June to February, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Twin-Spotted Quaker?
Between 10 pm and 1 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Twin-Spotted Quaker sightings with a recorded time, and about 6 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is seen both by day and at night.
Is Bavarian Forest National Park the best place to see a Twin-Spotted Quaker?
Among the best
Of the 3 parks where we can rate Twin-Spotted Quaker sightings, Bavarian Forest National Park ranks 2nd at about 10%, level with the leaders once rounded. The best odds are in Snowdonia National Park (United Kingdom, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Twin-Spotted Quaker live in Bavarian Forest National Park?
Same family: Noctuidae
The closest relatives of the Twin-Spotted Quaker that you can see in Bavarian Forest National Park (family Noctuidae, Cutworm Moths and Allies) are Silver Υ (about 20%), Knot Grass Moth (about 20%) and Large Yellow Underwing (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Twin-Spotted Quaker sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Twin-Spotted Quaker is recorded against all the insects logged in Bavarian Forest National Park (11 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.