Tenagogerris euphrosyne
In 3 days ~20% in a week ~40%
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Royal National Park | 🇦🇺 Australia | |
| 2 | Lamington National Park | 🇦🇺 Australia | |
| 3 | Blue Mountains National Park | 🇦🇺 Australia | |
| 4 | Springbrook National Park | 🇦🇺 Australia |
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Tenagogerris euphrosyne sighting in Blue Mountains National Park on a given day, based on 18 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 225th most-seen of the 789 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
March–April, June, August and November–January
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Tenagogerris euphrosyne in Blue Mountains National Park on a given day, against under 5% in February, May, July and September–October, the lowest months.
Between 11 am and 2 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Tenagogerris euphrosyne sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Among the best
Of the 4 parks where we can rate Tenagogerris euphrosyne sightings, Blue Mountains National Park ranks 3rd at about 10%, level with the leaders once rounded. The best odds are in Royal National Park (Australia, about 10%) and Lamington National Park (Australia, about 10%).
Same order: Hemiptera
The closest relatives of the Tenagogerris euphrosyne that you can see in Blue Mountains National Park (order Hemiptera, True Bugs, Hoppers, Aphids, and allies) are Green Grocer (about 40%), Metallic Shield Bug (about 20%) and Razor Grinder (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Tenagogerris euphrosyne is recorded against all the insects logged in Blue Mountains National Park (18 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
