What are the chances of seeing a Tracholena sulfurosa in Blue Mountains National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Tracholena sulfurosa sighting in Blue Mountains National Park on a given day, based on 14 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 294th most-seen of the 789 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Tracholena sulfurosa in Blue Mountains National Park?
January–April and August–November
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Tracholena sulfurosa in Blue Mountains National Park on a given day, against under 5% in May–July and December, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Tracholena sulfurosa?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Tracholena sulfurosa sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Where else can you see a Tracholena sulfurosa?
Only Blue Mountains National Park, in our data
Blue Mountains National Park is the only park on Wallace's Line with enough records to rate Tracholena sulfurosa sightings: about 10% of wildlife watchers there report one on a given day.
Which relatives of the Tracholena sulfurosa live in Blue Mountains National Park?
Same family: Tortricidae
The closest relatives of the Tracholena sulfurosa that you can see in Blue Mountains National Park (family Tortricidae, Tortricid Leafroller Moths) are Acroceuthes metaxanthana (about 10%), Cotton Tipworm Moth (about 10%) and Orange Fruit Borer (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Tracholena sulfurosa sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Tracholena sulfurosa is recorded against all the insects logged in Blue Mountains National Park (14 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.