What are the chances of seeing an Alurnus ornatus in Braulio Carrillo National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report an Alurnus ornatus sighting in Braulio Carrillo National Park on a given day, based on 30 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 66th most-seen of the 378 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 40%, and over a week to about 70%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see an Alurnus ornatus in Braulio Carrillo National Park?
July
In that month about 30% of wildlife watchers report an Alurnus ornatus in Braulio Carrillo National Park on a given day, against under 5% in October, the lowest month.
What time of day is best to see an Alurnus ornatus?
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Alurnus ornatus sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Braulio Carrillo National Park the best place to see an Alurnus ornatus?
Yes
Of the 4 parks where we can rate Alurnus ornatus sightings, Braulio Carrillo National Park has the highest daily chance: about 10%. Next come Tenorio Volcano National Park (Costa Rica, about 10%) and Tortuguero National Park (Costa Rica, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Alurnus ornatus live in Braulio Carrillo National Park?
Same family: Chrysomelidae
The closest relatives of the Alurnus ornatus that you can see in Braulio Carrillo National Park (family Chrysomelidae, Leaf Beetles) are Omophoita aequinoctialis (about 20%), Asphaera discicollis (about 20%) and Ringed Tortoise Beetle (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Alurnus ornatus sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Alurnus ornatus is recorded against all the insects logged in Braulio Carrillo National Park (30 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.