What are the chances of seeing a Taeniotes scalatus in Braulio Carrillo National Park?
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Taeniotes scalatus sighting in Braulio Carrillo National Park on a given day, based on 71 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 17th most-seen of the 378 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 60%, and over a week to about 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Taeniotes scalatus in Braulio Carrillo National Park?
January
In that month about 40% of wildlife watchers report a Taeniotes scalatus in Braulio Carrillo National Park on a given day, against about 10% in May, July, September and December, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Taeniotes scalatus?
Between 7 and 10 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Taeniotes scalatus sightings with a recorded time, and about 6 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is seen both by day and at night.
Is Braulio Carrillo National Park the best place to see a Taeniotes scalatus?
2nd of 16
Of the 16 parks where we can rate Taeniotes scalatus sightings, Braulio Carrillo National Park ranks 2nd at about 20%. The best odds are in Main Ridge Forest Reserve (Trinidad and Tobago, about 30%).
Which relatives of the Taeniotes scalatus live in Braulio Carrillo National Park?
Same family: Cerambycidae
The closest relatives of the Taeniotes scalatus that you can see in Braulio Carrillo National Park (family Cerambycidae, Longhorn Beetles) are Harlequin Beetle (about 20%), Oedudes bifasciatus (about 10%) and Callipogon lemoinei (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Taeniotes scalatus sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Taeniotes scalatus is recorded against all the insects logged in Braulio Carrillo National Park (71 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.