What are the chances of seeing a Harlequin Beetle in Braulio Carrillo National Park?
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Harlequin Beetle sighting in Braulio Carrillo National Park on a given day, based on 50 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 32nd most-seen of the 378 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 50%, and over a week to about 80%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Harlequin Beetle in Braulio Carrillo National Park?
January
In that month about 40% of wildlife watchers report a Harlequin Beetle in Braulio Carrillo National Park on a given day, against under 5% in May and November, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Harlequin Beetle?
Between 7 and 10 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Harlequin Beetle sightings with a recorded time, and about half of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is seen both by day and at night.
Is Braulio Carrillo National Park the best place to see a Harlequin Beetle?
Yes
Of the 9 parks where we can rate Harlequin Beetle sightings, Braulio Carrillo National Park has the highest daily chance: about 20%. Next come Rincón de la Vieja National Park (Costa Rica, about 20%) and Piedras Blancas National Park (Costa Rica, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Harlequin Beetle live in Braulio Carrillo National Park?
Same family: Cerambycidae
The closest relatives of the Harlequin Beetle that you can see in Braulio Carrillo National Park (family Cerambycidae, Longhorn Beetles) are Taeniotes scalatus (about 20%), Oedudes bifasciatus (about 10%) and Callipogon lemoinei (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Harlequin Beetle sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Harlequin Beetle is recorded against all the insects logged in Braulio Carrillo National Park (50 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.