Incarcha argentilinea
In 3 days ~20% in a week ~30%
Incarcha argentilinea is a species of snout moth found in Peru. It was first described by Herbert Druce in 1910. Wikipedia →
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Brownsberg Nature Park | 🇸🇷 Suriname | |
| 2 | Manu National Park | 🇵🇪 Peru | |
| 3 | Braulio Carrillo National Park | 🇨🇷 Costa Rica | |
| 4 | Monteverde Cloud Forest Reserve | 🇨🇷 Costa Rica |
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report an Incarcha argentilinea sighting in Braulio Carrillo National Park on a given day, based on 6 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 325th most-seen of the 378 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 30%, if each day is a fresh chance.
January, March–April and October
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report an Incarcha argentilinea in Braulio Carrillo National Park on a given day, against under 5% in February, May–September and November–December, the lowest months.
Between 5 and 8 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Incarcha argentilinea sightings with a recorded time, and about 6 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is most active around dawn and dusk.
3rd of 4
Of the 4 parks where we can rate Incarcha argentilinea sightings, Braulio Carrillo National Park ranks 3rd at about 10%. The best odds are in Brownsberg Nature Park (Suriname, about 30%) and Manu National Park (Peru, about 10%).
Same order: Lepidoptera
The closest relatives of the Incarcha argentilinea that you can see in Braulio Carrillo National Park (order Lepidoptera, Butterflies and Moths) are Banded Peacock (about 40%), Walker's Moth (about 40%) and Red-Washed Satyr (about 30%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Incarcha argentilinea is recorded against all the insects logged in Braulio Carrillo National Park (6 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
