What are the chances of seeing a Fulvous Shrike-Tanager in Brownsberg Nature Park?
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Fulvous Shrike-Tanager sighting in Brownsberg Nature Park on a given day, based on 50 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 89th most-seen of the 221 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 50%, and over a week to about 80%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Fulvous Shrike-Tanager in Brownsberg Nature Park?
August and November
In those months about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Fulvous Shrike-Tanager in Brownsberg Nature Park on a given day, against about 10% in October and December–January, the lowest months. May to July have too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see a Fulvous Shrike-Tanager?
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Fulvous Shrike-Tanager sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Brownsberg Nature Park the best place to see a Fulvous Shrike-Tanager?
Yes
Of the 4 parks where we can rate Fulvous Shrike-Tanager sightings, Brownsberg Nature Park has the highest daily chance: about 20%. Next come Amacayacu National Natural Park (Colombia, under 5%) and Yasuní National Park (Ecuador, under 5%).
Which relatives of the Fulvous Shrike-Tanager live in Brownsberg Nature Park?
Same family: Thraupidae
The closest relatives of the Fulvous Shrike-Tanager that you can see in Brownsberg Nature Park (family Thraupidae, Tanagers and Allies) are Purple Honeycreeper (about 70%), Red-legged Honeycreeper (about 70%) and Green Honeycreeper (about 50%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Fulvous Shrike-Tanager sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Fulvous Shrike-Tanager is recorded against all the birds logged in Brownsberg Nature Park (50 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.