What are the chances of seeing a Compact Weaver in Bwindi Impenetrable National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Compact Weaver sighting in Bwindi Impenetrable National Park on a given day, based on 7 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 382nd most-seen of the 400 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Compact Weaver in Bwindi Impenetrable National Park?
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Compact Weaver in Bwindi Impenetrable National Park on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season.
What time of day is best to see a Compact Weaver?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Compact Weaver sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Bwindi Impenetrable National Park the best place to see a Compact Weaver?
4th of 4
Of the 4 parks where we can rate Compact Weaver sightings, Bwindi Impenetrable National Park ranks 4th at under 5%. The best odds are in Kibale National Park (Uganda, about 10%), Queen Elizabeth National Park (Uganda, about 10%) and Murchison Falls National Park (Uganda, under 5%).
Which relatives of the Compact Weaver live in Bwindi Impenetrable National Park?
Same genus: Ploceus
The closest relatives of the Compact Weaver that you can see in Bwindi Impenetrable National Park (genus Ploceus, Typical Weavers) are Brown-capped Weaver (about 40%), Baglafecht Weaver (about 30%) and Black-necked Weaver (about 30%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Compact Weaver sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Compact Weaver is recorded against all the birds logged in Bwindi Impenetrable National Park (7 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.