What are the chances of seeing a Black-necked Weaver in Bwindi Impenetrable National Park?
Possible
About 30% of wildlife watchers report a Black-necked Weaver sighting in Bwindi Impenetrable National Park on a given day, based on 629 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 37th most-seen of the 400 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 70%, and over a week to about 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Black-necked Weaver in Bwindi Impenetrable National Park?
November and December
In those months about 40% of wildlife watchers report a Black-necked Weaver in Bwindi Impenetrable National Park on a given day, against about 10% in April, the lowest month.
What time of day is best to see a Black-necked Weaver?
Between 5 and 8 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Black-necked Weaver sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Bwindi Impenetrable National Park the best place to see a Black-necked Weaver?
2nd of 19
Of the 19 parks where we can rate Black-necked Weaver sightings, Bwindi Impenetrable National Park ranks 2nd at about 30%. The best odds are in Kibale National Park (Uganda, about 40%).
Which relatives of the Black-necked Weaver live in Bwindi Impenetrable National Park?
Same genus: Ploceus
The closest relatives of the Black-necked Weaver that you can see in Bwindi Impenetrable National Park (genus Ploceus, Typical Weavers) are Brown-capped Weaver (about 40%), Baglafecht Weaver (about 30%) and Black-billed Weaver (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Black-necked Weaver sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Black-necked Weaver is recorded against all the birds logged in Bwindi Impenetrable National Park (629 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.