What are the chances of seeing a Strange Weaver in Bwindi Impenetrable National Park?
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Strange Weaver sighting in Bwindi Impenetrable National Park on a given day, based on 431 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 60th most-seen of the 400 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 50%, and over a week to about 80%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Strange Weaver in Bwindi Impenetrable National Park?
January, May, July–August and October
In those months about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Strange Weaver in Bwindi Impenetrable National Park on a given day, against about 10% in April, September and November–December, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Strange Weaver?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Strange Weaver sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Bwindi Impenetrable National Park the best place to see a Strange Weaver?
Among the best
Of the 4 parks where we can rate Strange Weaver sightings, Bwindi Impenetrable National Park ranks 2nd at about 20%, level with the leaders once rounded. The best odds are in Nyungwe National Park (Rwanda, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Strange Weaver live in Bwindi Impenetrable National Park?
Same genus: Ploceus
The closest relatives of the Strange Weaver that you can see in Bwindi Impenetrable National Park (genus Ploceus, Typical Weavers) are Brown-capped Weaver (about 40%), Baglafecht Weaver (about 30%) and Black-necked Weaver (about 30%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Strange Weaver sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Strange Weaver is recorded against all the birds logged in Bwindi Impenetrable National Park (431 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.