Chioides catillus
In 3 days ~40% in a week ~70%
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bahía de Loreto National Park | 🇲🇽 Mexico | |
| 2 | Cumbres de Monterrey National Park | 🇲🇽 Mexico |
| # | City | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Austin | 🇺🇸 United States | |
| 2 | San Antonio | 🇺🇸 United States | |
| 3 | Houston | 🇺🇸 United States | |
| 4 | Vitória | 🇧🇷 Brazil | |
| 5 | São Paulo | 🇧🇷 Brazil | |
| 6 | Campinas | 🇧🇷 Brazil | |
| 7 | Monterrey | 🇲🇽 México | |
| 8 | Mexico City | 🇲🇽 México |
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Blurry-Striped Longtail sighting in Austin on a given day, based on 620 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data. It is the 29th most-seen of the 1624 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 40%, and over a week to about 70%, if each day is a fresh chance.
July to October
In those months about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Blurry-Striped Longtail in Austin on a given day, against under 5% in January and February, the lowest months.
Between 11 am and 2 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Blurry-Striped Longtail sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Yes
Of the 8 cities where we can rate Blurry-Striped Longtail sightings, Austin has the highest daily chance: about 20%. Next come San Antonio (United States, about 20%) and Houston (United States, about 10%).
Same family: Hesperiidae
The closest relatives of the Blurry-Striped Longtail that you can see in Austin (family Hesperiidae, Skippers) are Fiery Skipper (about 20%), Clouded Skipper (about 10%) and Horace's Duskywing (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Blurry-Striped Longtail is recorded against all the insects logged in Austin (620 verified sightings), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
