Tetragonisca fiebrigi
In 3 days ~10% in a week ~20%
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | El Impenetrable National Park | 🇦🇷 Argentina | |
| 2 | Iguazú National Park | 🇦🇷 Argentina | |
| 3 | Iguaçu National Park | 🇧🇷 Brazil |
| # | City | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Porto Alegre | 🇧🇷 Brazil | |
| 2 | Rosario | 🇦🇷 Argentina | |
| 3 | Curitiba | 🇧🇷 Brazil | |
| 4 | Asuncion | 🇵🇾 Paraguay | |
| 5 | Buenos Aires | 🇦🇷 Argentina |
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Fiebrig's Stingless Bee sighting in Buenos Aires on a given day, based on 21 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data. It is the 290th most-seen of the 558 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 20%, if each day is a fresh chance.
November and December
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Fiebrig's Stingless Bee in Buenos Aires on a given day, against under 5% in January to October, the lowest months.
Between 2 and 5 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Fiebrig's Stingless Bee sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
5th of 5
Of the 5 cities where we can rate Fiebrig's Stingless Bee sightings, Buenos Aires ranks 5th at under 5%. The best odds are in Porto Alegre (Brazil, about 30%), Rosario (Argentina, about 20%) and Curitiba (Brazil, about 20%).
Same family: Apidae
The closest relatives of the Fiebrig's Stingless Bee that you can see in Buenos Aires (family Apidae, Honey Bees, Bumble Bees, and Allies) are Paulista Bumble Bee (about 10%), Xylocopa augusti (about 10%) and Xylocopa frontalis (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Fiebrig's Stingless Bee is recorded against all the insects logged in Buenos Aires (21 verified sightings), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
