Hypercompe indecisa
Daily sighting probability ~10% · With luck
at Buenos Aires

In 3 days ~20% in a week ~30%

71 Verified sightings at Buenos Aires
September Best month

About the Hypercompe indecisa

Hypercompe indecisa is a moth of the family Erebidae first described by Francis Walker in 1855. It is found in Argentina and Uruguay. Larvae have been recorded feeding on Beta, Brassica, Citrus, Cucurbita, Datura, Diospyros, Fragaria, Hippeastrum, Leucanthemum, Persea, Pisum, Prunus, Ricinus, Rosa, Senecio, Solanum, Spiraea and Zea species. Wikipedia →

Global Distribution

Parks Where Found

# Park Country Daily sighting probability

More parks will be added in future updates.

Cities Where Found

# City Country Daily sighting probability
1 Curitiba 🇧🇷 Brazil
~10%
2 Cordoba 🇦🇷 Argentina
~10%
3 Buenos Aires 🇦🇷 Argentina
~10%

Before you go

What are the chances of seeing a Hypercompe indecisa in Buenos Aires?

With luck

About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Hypercompe indecisa sighting in Buenos Aires on a given day, based on 71 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data. It is the 146th most-seen of the 558 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 30%, if each day is a fresh chance.

When is the best time to see a Hypercompe indecisa in Buenos Aires?

August to March

In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Hypercompe indecisa in Buenos Aires on a given day, against under 5% in April to July, the lowest months.

Is Buenos Aires the best place to see a Hypercompe indecisa?

Among the best

Of the 3 cities where we can rate Hypercompe indecisa sightings, Buenos Aires ranks 3rd at about 10%, level with the leaders once rounded. The best odds are in Curitiba (Brazil, about 10%) and Cordoba (Argentina, about 10%).

Where does the Hypercompe indecisa sighting chance come from?

GBIF citizen-science records

It is estimated from how often the Hypercompe indecisa is recorded against all the insects logged in Buenos Aires (71 verified sightings), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.

← Back to Buenos Aires