Cosmosoma auge
In 3 days ~10% in a week ~30%
Cosmosoma auge is a moth of the family Erebidae. It was described by Carl Linnaeus in 1767. It is found in Mexico, Panama, Colombia, Suriname, Brazil (São Paulo) and Uruguay, as well as on St. Thomas, Jamaica, Cuba and Puerto Rico. Wikipedia →
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blue and John Crow Mountains National Park | 🇯🇲 Jamaica |
More parks will be added in future updates.
| # | City | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cordoba | 🇦🇷 Argentina | |
| 2 | Buenos Aires | 🇦🇷 Argentina | |
| 3 | Medellín | 🇨🇴 Colombia | |
| 4 | São Paulo | 🇧🇷 Brazil |
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Cosmosoma auge sighting in Buenos Aires on a given day, based on 44 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data. It is the 191st most-seen of the 558 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 30%, if each day is a fresh chance.
March and May–July
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Cosmosoma auge in Buenos Aires on a given day, against under 5% in April and August–February, the lowest months.
Between 7 and 10 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Cosmosoma auge sightings with a recorded time, and about 7 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is most active around dawn and dusk.
2nd of 4
Of the 4 cities where we can rate Cosmosoma auge sightings, Buenos Aires ranks 2nd at under 5%. The best odds are in Cordoba (Argentina, about 10%).
Same family: Erebidae
The closest relatives of the Cosmosoma auge that you can see in Buenos Aires (family Erebidae, Underwing, Tiger, Tussock, and Allied Moths) are Ctenucha rubriceps (about 10%), Dysschema sacrifica (about 10%) and Halysidota ruscheweyhi (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Cosmosoma auge is recorded against all the insects logged in Buenos Aires (44 verified sightings), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
