Eneoptera surinamensis
In 3 days ~20% in a week ~50%
Eneoptera surinamensis is a species of cricket from the genus Eneoptera. The species was originally described by Charles De Geer in 1773 Wikipedia →
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Iguaçu National Park | 🇧🇷 Brazil | |
| 2 | Iguazú National Park | 🇦🇷 Argentina | |
| 3 | Manu National Park | 🇵🇪 Peru |
| # | City | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fortaleza | 🇧🇷 Brazil |
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report an Eneoptera surinamensis sighting in Fortaleza on a given day, based on 5 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data. It is the 96th most-seen of the 112 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 50%, if each day is a fresh chance.
October and December
In those months about 20% of wildlife watchers report an Eneoptera surinamensis in Fortaleza on a given day, against under 5% in January–March, May–July and November, the lowest months. Those are among Fortaleza's driest months, with about 20 mm of rain a month against 240 mm in April.
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Eneoptera surinamensis sightings with a recorded time, and about 7 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Only Fortaleza, in our data
Fortaleza is the only city on Wallace's Line with enough records to rate Eneoptera surinamensis sightings: about 10% of wildlife watchers there report one on a given day.
Same order: Orthoptera
The closest relatives of the Eneoptera surinamensis that you can see in Fortaleza (order Orthoptera, Grasshoppers, Crickets, and Katydids) are Violet-Winged Grasshopper (about 20%), Abracris flavolineata (about 20%) and Algete brunneri (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Eneoptera surinamensis is recorded against all the insects logged in Fortaleza (5 verified sightings), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
