Lophophleps purpurea

Lophophleps purpurea

Lophophleps purpurea

Daily sighting probability ~10% · With luck
at Hong Kong

In 3 days ~10% in a week ~30%

26 Verified sightings at Hong Kong
March Best month

Global Distribution

Parks Where Found

# Park Country Daily sighting probability

More parks will be added in future updates.

Cities Where Found

# City Country Daily sighting probability
1 Hong Kong 🇨🇳 China
~10%

Before you go

What are the chances of seeing a Lophophleps purpurea in Hong Kong?

With luck

About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Lophophleps purpurea sighting in Hong Kong on a given day, based on 26 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data. It is the 362nd most-seen of the 1125 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 30%, if each day is a fresh chance.

When is the best time to see a Lophophleps purpurea in Hong Kong?

February–March, June–August and October–November

In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Lophophleps purpurea in Hong Kong on a given day, against under 5% in April–May, September and December–January, the lowest months.

Where else can you see a Lophophleps purpurea?

Only Hong Kong, in our data

Hong Kong is the only city on Wallace's Line with enough records to rate Lophophleps purpurea sightings: about 10% of wildlife watchers there report one on a given day.

Which relatives of the Lophophleps purpurea live in Hong Kong?

Same family: Geometridae

The closest relatives of the Lophophleps purpurea that you can see in Hong Kong (family Geometridae, Geometer Moths) are False Tiger Moth (about 30%), Milionia basalis (about 10%) and Orange Magpie Moth (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.

Where does the Lophophleps purpurea sighting chance come from?

GBIF citizen-science records

It is estimated from how often the Lophophleps purpurea is recorded against all the insects logged in Hong Kong (26 verified sightings), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.

← Back to Hong Kong