Pylargosceles steganioides

Pylargosceles steganioides

Pylargosceles steganioides

Daily sighting probability <5% · Rare
at Hong Kong

In 3 days ~10% in a week ~20%

14 Verified sightings at Hong Kong
February Best month

Global Distribution

Parks Where Found

# Park Country Daily sighting probability

More parks will be added in future updates.

Cities Where Found

# City Country Daily sighting probability
1 Tokyo 🇯🇵 Japan
<5%
2 Hong Kong 🇨🇳 China
<5%

Before you go

What are the chances of seeing a Pylargosceles steganioides in Hong Kong?

Rare

Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Pylargosceles steganioides sighting in Hong Kong on a given day, based on 14 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data. It is the 583rd most-seen of the 1125 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 20%, if each day is a fresh chance.

When is the best time to see a Pylargosceles steganioides in Hong Kong?

February–March and August

In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Pylargosceles steganioides in Hong Kong on a given day, against under 5% in April–July and September–January, the lowest months.

Is Hong Kong the best place to see a Pylargosceles steganioides?

Among the best

Of the 2 cities where we can rate Pylargosceles steganioides sightings, Hong Kong ranks 2nd at under 5%, level with the leaders once rounded. The best odds are in Tokyo (Japan, under 5%).

Which relatives of the Pylargosceles steganioides live in Hong Kong?

Same family: Geometridae

The closest relatives of the Pylargosceles steganioides that you can see in Hong Kong (family Geometridae, Geometer Moths) are False Tiger Moth (about 30%), Milionia basalis (about 10%) and Orange Magpie Moth (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.

Where does the Pylargosceles steganioides sighting chance come from?

GBIF citizen-science records

It is estimated from how often the Pylargosceles steganioides is recorded against all the insects logged in Hong Kong (14 verified sightings), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.

← Back to Hong Kong