Condylostylus caudatus

Condylostylus caudatus

Condylostylus caudatus

Daily sighting probability <5% · Rare
at Montreal

In 3 days ~10% in a week ~20%

10 Verified sightings at Montreal
June Best month

About the Condylostylus caudatus

Condylostylus caudatus is a species of long-legged fly in the family Dolichopodidae. Wikipedia →

Global Distribution

Parks Where Found

# Park Country Daily sighting probability

More parks will be added in future updates.

Cities Where Found

# City Country Daily sighting probability
1 Washington 🇺🇸 United States
<5%
2 New York City 🇺🇸 United States
<5%
3 Boston 🇺🇸 United States
<5%
4 Montreal 🇨🇦 Canada
<5%
5 Toronto 🇨🇦 Canada
<5%
6 Houston 🇺🇸 United States
<5%
7 Chicago 🇺🇸 United States
<5%
8 Dallas 🇺🇸 United States
<5%

Before you go

What are the chances of seeing a Condylostylus caudatus in Montreal?

Rare

Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Condylostylus caudatus sighting in Montreal on a given day, based on 10 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data. It is the 556th most-seen of the 926 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 20%, if each day is a fresh chance.

When is the best time to see a Condylostylus caudatus in Montreal?

June

In that month about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Condylostylus caudatus in Montreal on a given day, against under 5% in July to May, the lowest months.

Is Montreal the best place to see a Condylostylus caudatus?

Among the best

Of the 8 cities where we can rate Condylostylus caudatus sightings, Montreal ranks 4th at under 5%, level with the leaders once rounded. The best odds are in Washington (United States, under 5%), New York City (United States, under 5%) and Boston (United States, under 5%).

Where does the Condylostylus caudatus sighting chance come from?

GBIF citizen-science records

It is estimated from how often the Condylostylus caudatus is recorded against all the insects logged in Montreal (10 verified sightings), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.

← Back to Montreal