Horornis fortipes
Silhouette: Jiekun He · PhyloPic
In 3 days ~40% in a week ~60%
The brown-flanked bush warbler (Horornis fortipes), also known as the brownish-flanked bush warbler, is a species of bush-warbler of the family Cettiidae. It was formerly included in the "Old World warbler" assemblage. It is found in Himalayas, South China and Southeast Asia. Wikipedia →
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Taroko National Park | 🇹🇼 Taiwan | |
| 2 | Jiuzhaigou National Park | 🇨🇳 China | |
| 3 | Royal Manas National Park | 🇧🇹 Bhutan | |
| 4 | Jim Corbett National Park | 🇮🇳 India | |
| 5 | Manas National Park | 🇮🇳 India |
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Brownish-flanked Bush-Warbler sighting in Nanchang on a given day, based on 13 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data. It is the 50th most-seen of the 79 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 40%, and over a week to about 60%, if each day is a fresh chance.
May
In that month about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Brownish-flanked Bush-Warbler in Nanchang on a given day, against about 10% in April, July–October and December, the lowest months. That is one of Nanchang's wettest months, with about 220 mm of rain against 55 mm in October. February and November have too few records to rate.
Between 1 and 4 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Brownish-flanked Bush-Warbler sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
5th of 19
Of the 19 cities where we can rate Brownish-flanked Bush-Warbler sightings, Nanchang ranks 5th at about 10%. The best odds are in Guiyang (China, about 50%), Hangzhou (China, about 40%) and Hefei (China, about 20%).
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Brownish-flanked Bush-Warbler is recorded against all the birds logged in Nanchang (13 verified sightings), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
