Doxocopa kallina

Doxocopa kallina

Doxocopa kallina

Daily sighting probability ~10% · With luck
at Porto Alegre

In 3 days ~20% in a week ~40%

19 Verified sightings at Porto Alegre
19 In all 2 parks From 2019 to 2026
January Best month
☀️ Diurnal When it's spotted

Global Distribution

Parks Where Found

# Park Country Daily sighting probability
1 Iguaçu National Park 🇧🇷 Brazil
~10%
2 Iguazú National Park 🇦🇷 Argentina
~10%

Cities Where Found

# City Country Daily sighting probability
1 Curitiba 🇧🇷 Brazil
~10%
2 Porto Alegre 🇧🇷 Brazil
~10%
3 São Paulo 🇧🇷 Brazil
<5%

Before you go

What are the chances of seeing a Doxocopa kallina in Porto Alegre?

With luck

About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Doxocopa kallina sighting in Porto Alegre on a given day, based on 19 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data. It is the 160th most-seen of the 226 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.

When is the best time to see a Doxocopa kallina in Porto Alegre?

June and December–April

In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Doxocopa kallina in Porto Alegre on a given day, against under 5% in May and July–November, the lowest months.

What time of day is best to see a Doxocopa kallina?

Between 10 am and 1 pm

Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Doxocopa kallina sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.

Is Porto Alegre the best place to see a Doxocopa kallina?

Among the best

Of the 3 cities where we can rate Doxocopa kallina sightings, Porto Alegre ranks 2nd at about 10%, level with the leaders once rounded. The best odds are in Curitiba (Brazil, about 10%).

Where does the Doxocopa kallina sighting chance come from?

GBIF citizen-science records

It is estimated from how often the Doxocopa kallina is recorded against all the insects logged in Porto Alegre (19 verified sightings), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.

← Back to Porto Alegre